Mmcp.market

Head to head

HubVibe Site Audits vs Citable

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HubVibe Site Auditsio.github.Its-fortunatefolly/hubvibe
A
No reviews yet

Rule-based site audits: accessibility, SEO, security headers, performance. Metered per call.

Full listing
Citableio.github.zaialamm/citable-mcp
C
No reviews yet

SEO and AI-visibility checks agents buy per call — USDC on Solana, no API key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HubVibe Site Audits (85/100 against 55). HubVibe Site Audits is hosted and callable through the gateway; Citable runs on your own machine. HubVibe Site Audits has noticeably more public adoption.

 HubVibe Site AuditsCitable
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100C55/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars2–
Downloads / week–56
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools519
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-19—
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

HubVibe Site Audits vs SyteCheckHubVibe Site Audits vs SEO DataHubVibe Site Audits vs GlasserHubVibe Site Audits vs GridarHubVibe Site Audits vs SEO AuthorityAll SEO servers