Head to head
NUM vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real places for your agent. Search 2.5M+ travel places; submit a business for human review.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Run parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harness
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 92 out of 100). NUM is hosted and callable through the gateway; Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code runs on your own machine.
| NUM | Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 11 |
| Downloads / week | – | 156 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 14 |
| Write actions | 2 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |