Head to head
IWE vs accessibility-statement-lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Markdown knowledge base as agent memory. Runs against the notes directory it is started in.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Checks the accessibility statement you already published against the EU model statement and its two
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 89 out of 100). IWE has noticeably more public adoption.
| IWE | accessibility-statement-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 1.7k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 147 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |