Head to head
CapabilityWire vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
CapabilityWire
Cio.github.jawauntb/capabilitywireNo reviews yet
A live, curated feed of new AI agent capabilities across MCP, SDKs, models, and APIs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (83/100 against 64). CapabilityWire is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| CapabilityWire | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C64/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 32 |
| Downloads / week | – | 193 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |