Mmcp.market

Head to head

jCodemunch MCP vs hardcoded-credential-audit

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

jCodemunch MCPio.github.jgravelle/jcodemunch-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.

Full listing
hardcoded-credential-auditio.github.jmshinhwa/hardcoded-credential-audit
A
No reviews yet

Open any config file and see every hardcoded credential — and every setting that quietly undoes your

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours hardcoded-credential-audit (89/100 against 66). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 jCodemunch MCPhardcoded-credential-audit
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC66/100A89/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars2.7k0
Downloads / week6.0k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

jCodemunch MCP vs Azure MCP ServerjCodemunch MCP vs SemioticjCodemunch MCP vs World MonitorjCodemunch MCP vs NetdatajCodemunch MCP vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers