Mmcp.market

Head to head

jCodemunch MCP vs ThreatLocker MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

jCodemunch MCPio.github.jgravelle/jcodemunch-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.

Full listing
ThreatLocker MCPio.github.Servosity/threatlocker-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Every ThreatLocker Portal API feature, plus the write operations the read-only tools lack and a

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ThreatLocker MCP (75/100 against 66). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 jCodemunch MCPThreatLocker MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC66/100B75/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2.7k41
Downloads / week6.0k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryEverything elseEverything else