Head to head
jev-ultrafast-mcp vs domscout
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hand browser work off to a server-side agent: read the page as a table, act, then verify.
Full listing
No reviews yet
domscout browser API as MCP tools: screenshots, Markdown, structured data, page automation, crawls.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours jev-ultrafast-mcp (92/100 against 80).
| jev-ultrafast-mcp | domscout | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 310 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 10 | 10 |
| Write actions | 2 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |