Head to head
MCP vs Sanções ONU (Conselho de Segurança)
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingSanções ONU (Conselho de Segurança)
Aio.github.mcp-dir/sancoes_onu-mcpNo reviews yet
Checks whether a name is on the UN Security Council consolidated sanctions list, for compliance and
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 88 out of 100). Sanções ONU (Conselho de Segurança) is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Sanções ONU (Conselho de Segurança) | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 778 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-08-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |