Head to head
domscout vs Broken Link Checker
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
domscout browser API as MCP tools: screenshots, Markdown, structured data, page automation, crawls.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Crawl a site for broken links, 404s, dead images and redirect chains, with the page each is on
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours domscout (80/100 against 67). Broken Link Checker is hosted and callable through the gateway; domscout runs on your own machine. domscout has noticeably more public adoption.
| domscout | Broken Link Checker | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 310 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 10 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |