Head to head
Cra 24 72 14 Reporting Lint vs MCPComp Diagnostics
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reads your SECURITY.md against the EU Cyber Resilience Act reporting clock that started on 11 Septem
Full listingNo reviews yet
Grade an MCP server's auth against the spec and diagnose which layer a failure is in.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cra 24 72 14 Reporting Lint (89/100 against 60). Cra 24 72 14 Reporting Lint has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cra 24 72 14 Reporting Lint | MCPComp Diagnostics | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 441 | 55 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |