Head to head
Security Headers Csp Lint vs Trooth
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reads security headers and CSP line by line in your config file and names the lines that silently do
Full listing
No reviews yet
Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 85 out of 100). Trooth is hosted and callable through the gateway; Security Headers Csp Lint runs on your own machine.
| Security Headers Csp Lint | Trooth | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 345 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |