Head to head
security-txt-cra-lint vs MCPProxy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours security-txt-cra-lint (89/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| security-txt-cra-lint | MCPProxy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 376 |
| Downloads / week | 377 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |