Head to head
SQL Card Data Lint vs Neon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Names every column, index, view and seed row in a .sql migration that stores card data, with its PCI
Full listing
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 89). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; SQL Card Data Lint runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.
| SQL Card Data Lint | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 648 |
| Downloads / week | 400 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |