Head to head
Basalt vs Mako
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Explore your databases, validate SQL, and build & publish data apps in your Mako workspace.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mako (98/100 against 83). Mako is hosted and callable through the gateway; Basalt runs on your own machine.
| Basalt | Mako | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 14 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |