Mmcp.market

Head to head

DEEPBOM vs Weavatrix Quality

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

DEEPBOMio.github.JunHwan-Kwon/deepbom
B
No reviews yet

Browser-local and CLI static evidence for deployed AI model artifacts.

Full listing
Weavatrix Qualityio.github.Weavatrix/weavatrix-quality
A
No reviews yet

Revision-bound quality planning, execution, evidence, proof, and Playwright authoring.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 91 out of 100). DEEPBOM is hosted and callable through the gateway; Weavatrix Quality runs on your own machine. DEEPBOM has noticeably more public adoption.

 DEEPBOMWeavatrix Quality
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB84/100A91/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars20
Downloads / week1.5k53
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools4—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

DEEPBOM vs Cssprobe CLIDEEPBOM vs SeleniumBase MCPDEEPBOM vs AIHawkDEEPBOM vs Ui.Vision MCPDEEPBOM vs SafariAll Scraping and browsing servers