Head to head
Agenticmemory vs Pastea
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for AI agents — history, context, semantic search, queues. 17 tools, stdio/SSE.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read and re-copy your Mac clipboard history from Pastea. Local, pairs with one click.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pastea (91/100 against 83). Agenticmemory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pastea runs on your own machine.
| Agenticmemory | Pastea | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 79 | 22 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 17 | 1 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |