Head to head
PDF vs Local Rag
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 92 out of 100). Local Rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| Local Rag | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 136 | 399 |
| Downloads / week | – | 4.7k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |