Head to head
Silica Core vs Favro
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Favro cards, boards and collections over MCP: read, search, write, and resolve names to ids.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 88 out of 100). Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Silica Core | Favro | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 60 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 396 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |