Head to head
Silica Core vs YouTube Trends MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listing
No reviews yet
YouTube search interest and trend data over time, with growth metrics. Free key at trendsmcp.ai
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 85 out of 100). YouTube Trends MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Silica Core runs on your own machine. Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Silica Core | YouTube Trends MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 60 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 396 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-30 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |