Head to head
GitWarren vs Reckon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Code review on your own machine, for you and your coding agent. Nothing leaves your computer.
Full listingNo reviews yet
The commercial record your coding agent works from — deterministic pricing with full provenance
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitWarren (86/100 against 67). Reckon is hosted and callable through the gateway; GitWarren runs on your own machine. GitWarren has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitWarren | Reckon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 16 | – |
| Downloads / week | 1.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 17 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |