Head to head
NetOps Field Notes vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Config drift, CIS/PCI checks, 802.1X diagnosis, certs inside configs, topology, change pre-flight.
Full listingNo reviews yet
EU261/EC261 flight compensation eligibility and flight distance checks via AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours NetOps Field Notes (88/100 against 60). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; NetOps Field Notes runs on your own machine.
| NetOps Field Notes | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |