Head to head
Designesy vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Score any URL against a real design contract — 42 checks, A-F grade, token + motion validation.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Design websites, apps and logos with SketchXFlow — and brief its development team.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Designesy (91/100 against 58). Designesy is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. Designesy has noticeably more public adoption.
| Designesy | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 62 | 530 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 17 | 30 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Media | Media |