Head to head
Liner Search & Research vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time web and scholarly search with cited answers and multi-step deep research.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinysearch (82/100 against 70). Liner Search & Research is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine. Tinysearch has noticeably more public adoption.
| Liner Search & Research | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 229 |
| Downloads / week | – | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |