Head to head
gha-doctor vs Github Repo
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
gha-doctor
Cio.github.linnea-bakshi/gha-doctorNo reviews yet
Diagnose GitHub Actions CI: lint, flaky tests, wasted minutes, health score. Read-only MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for GitHub repo health, commit summaries, issue triage, and RAG Q&A.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Github Repo (83/100 against 68).
| gha-doctor | Github Repo | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 150 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |