Head to head
local-mcp vs nintact
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Let ChatGPT, Claude & Cursor use your Mac: email, calendar, iMessage, Teams, files. Local, free.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Contact forms that actually arrive. No SPF/DKIM, no SMTP. AI sorts them and drafts the reply.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours nintact (82/100 against 68). local-mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; nintact runs on your own machine. local-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| local-mcp | nintact | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 54 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 3.2k | 255 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category |