Head to head
Marm vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Octocode (94/100 against 74). Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Marm | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 380 | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 467 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |