Head to head
Passiv Web Tools vs Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free web tools for AI agents: HTML to Markdown, compliance scan, page profile, security headers.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded (91/100 against 70). Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Passiv Web Tools runs on your own machine.
| Passiv Web Tools | Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |