Head to head
Remem vs Lific
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first, lightweight issue tracker. Single binary, SQLite-backed, MCP-native.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lific (85/100 against 77).
| Remem | Lific | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 32 | 59 |
| Downloads / week | 401 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |