Head to head
Feedmyagent vs Arcstone Sidecar
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Technology intelligence feed for AI agents: tech stack, compliance, security.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Feedmyagent (86/100 against 65). Feedmyagent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arcstone Sidecar runs on your own machine.
| Feedmyagent | Arcstone Sidecar | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 17 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |