Mmcp.market

Head to head

orcaslicer-mcp vs deja-vu

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

orcaslicer-mcpio.github.MaxEllis/orcaslicer-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Work a running OrcaSlicer with AI: slice, tune, and understand what each setting costs

Full listing
deja-vuio.github.vshulcz/deja-vu
A
No reviews yet

deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours deja-vu (92/100 against 65). deja-vu has noticeably more public adoption.

 orcaslicer-mcpdeja-vu
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars53847
Downloads / week–929
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-19
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

orcaslicer-mcp vs Azure MCP Serverorcaslicer-mcp vs Semioticorcaslicer-mcp vs World Monitororcaslicer-mcp vs Netdataorcaslicer-mcp vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers
io.github.MaxEllis/orcaslicer-mcp vs io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu: which MCP server should you use? · mcp.market