Head to head
MCP Customs vs SPARDA
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCP Customs
Cio.github.mcpcustoms/mcp-customsNo reviews yet
Inspect an MCP server for common security risks before you install it. Offline, zero telemetry.
Full listingNo reviews yet
AI writes. SPARDA proves. Deterministic, offline security gate for AI edits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SPARDA (89/100 against 69).
| MCP Customs | SPARDA | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | 28 | 102 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |