Head to head
MCP Emails vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Never-stored live email: read, send, organize, schedule and auto-triage Gmail or any IMAP mailbox.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Email infrastructure for AI agents: send, read replies as threads, campaigns, per-key limits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Emails (96/100 against 84).
| MCP Emails | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A96/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 31 | 628 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category |