Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCPFax Agent Continuity vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCPFax Agent Continuitycom.mcpscores/agent-continuity
C
No reviews yet

Resume the work, not the conversation. A checkpoint by one model is resumable by another.

Full listing
Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Codeio.github.varadfromeast/codex-agy-bridge
A
No reviews yet

Run parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harness

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code (92/100 against 57). MCPFax Agent Continuity is hosted and callable through the gateway; Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code runs on your own machine. Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCPFax Agent ContinuityAsync Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC57/100A92/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–11
Downloads / week–156
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools3314
Write actions57
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents