Head to head
MCPFax Reliability vs runx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCPFax Reliability
Ccom.mcpscores/agent-reliability-scoresNo reviews yet
Before you pay an endpoint you cannot vouch for: credit grade, drift and preflight.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The governed runtime for agent skills. Search the catalog and inspect a skill before running it.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours runx (88/100 against 69). runx has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCPFax Reliability | runx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 91 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |