Head to head
MentionedOn Discovery Evidence Tools vs OpenQR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Assess AI-discovery readiness, plan visibility fixes, and summarize scan evidence. Read-only.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 69). OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| MentionedOn Discovery Evidence Tools | OpenQR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 45 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |