Head to head
Apple Notes vs Juris UCC Article 9 lien search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, read and act on Apple Notes — folders, attachments, writes off by default
Full listingJuris UCC Article 9 lien search
Cio.github.tthorstenson/jurisNo reviews yet
UCC Article 9 debtor lien search + honest list_coverage; fixture-default; live HTML ToS-GRAY opt-in
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Apple Notes (92/100 against 55). Apple Notes has noticeably more public adoption.
| Apple Notes | Juris UCC Article 9 lien search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 432 | 19 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | 2 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |