Head to head
RepeaterBook vs Content-Location URL shape, value discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Look up amateur radio repeaters from RepeaterBook.com by location, band, and mode.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Content-Location URL shape, value discarded (91/100 against 83). Content-Location URL shape, value discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; RepeaterBook runs on your own machine. RepeaterBook has noticeably more public adoption.
| RepeaterBook | Content-Location URL shape, value discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 172 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 30 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |