Head to head
Memory Vault vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Run402 (84/100 against 70). Run402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memory Vault runs on your own machine. Run402 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memory Vault | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 63 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |