Head to head
Mockzilla vs Website Starter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Mock OpenAPI specs locally, or log in to deploy hosted mocks on mockzilla.org from your MCP client.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Create Markdown instructions for AI agents to build, deploy, and maintain an Astro website.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (63 and 60 out of 100). Website Starter is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mockzilla runs on your own machine. Mockzilla has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mockzilla | Website Starter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C63/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 1.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |