Head to head
Toolpiper vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
On-device MCP tools for macOS: local AI, speech, vision, browser automation, system control.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 68). SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Toolpiper | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 13k |
| Downloads / week | – | 314k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-05 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |