Head to head
Mozaika vs mcp-architector
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Measured design systems decoded from 588 real products, for coding agents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for architecture and system design. Store and manage project architecture locally.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-architector (92/100 against 60). Mozaika is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-architector runs on your own machine. mcp-architector has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mozaika | mcp-architector | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 105 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 23 | 29 |
| Write actions | — | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-01 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |