Head to head
Chembl vs Rebase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Chembl
Cio.github.mrfentmen/chembl-mcpNo reviews yet
Drug molecules and bioactivity from the ChEMBL database. No key required.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Schema, database, document, user and dev-server tools for a Rebase backend project.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Rebase (82/100 against 65). Rebase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Chembl | Rebase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 994 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |