Mmcp.market

Head to head

Unicode Security vs MCPProxy

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Unicode Securityio.github.mrfentmen/unicode-security-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local first MCP checks for Unicode confusables, mixed scripts, invisible controls, and...

Full listing
MCPProxyio.github.smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
B
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Unicode Security (85/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.

 Unicode SecurityMCPProxy
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100B73/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars0377
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools3—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-08-082026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Unicode Security vs Reversecore MCPUnicode Security vs CodeInspectusUnicode Security vs ProdcheckUnicode Security vs MCPUnicode Security vs SecHelixAll Security servers