Head to head
prompt-protection vs Citation Tracker
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scan prompts, tool definitions and model output for injection, and guard agent tool calls.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Checks whether AI search engines cite your target domains for a prompt. $0.75/call via MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours prompt-protection (92/100 against 64). Citation Tracker is hosted and callable through the gateway; prompt-protection runs on your own machine. prompt-protection has noticeably more public adoption.
| prompt-protection | Citation Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C64/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 575 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |