Head to head
Octocode vs Youtube Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
YouTube data for AI agents: channels, videos, transcripts, comments, search. Video research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 98 out of 100). Youtube Data is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Octocode | Youtube Data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 475 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 404 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |