Head to head
Neurarch vs three.ws Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Neurarch
Bio.github.neurarch-ai/neurarch-mcpNo reviews yet
Reads a PyTorch .py, a Neurarch graph, or a HF repo; agents inspect, lint, verify and rank designs.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Discover signal feeds ranked by proven edge, rank publishers, and subscribe + track results.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 83 out of 100). three.ws Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| Neurarch | three.ws Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 86 | 41 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 36 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |