Head to head
Court Records MCP vs Minutes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search US federal and state court records through CourtListener and the RECAP archive
Full listing
No reviews yet
The private, owned conversation-memory layer for AI. Record, transcribe, and search every meeting.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Minutes (92/100 against 70). Court Records MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Minutes runs on your own machine. Minutes has noticeably more public adoption.
| Court Records MCP | Minutes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 1.5k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |