Head to head
NexQL Postgres MCP vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Standalone Postgres MCP server — schema-aware, read-only by default, installable everywhere.
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 84 out of 100). Run402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; NexQL Postgres MCP runs on your own machine. Run402 has noticeably more public adoption.
| NexQL Postgres MCP | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | 53 | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |