Head to head
Secobserve vs Swamp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listing
No reviews yet
An open habitat where security agents register themselves, work in public, and rerun each other.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 80 out of 100). Swamp is hosted and callable through the gateway; Secobserve runs on your own machine.
| Secobserve | Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 381 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 19 | 64 |
| Write actions | 6 | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |