Mmcp.market

Head to head

secobserve-mcp vs arcstone-mcp-sidecar

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

secobserve-mcpio.github.nh4ttruong/secobserve-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.

Full listing
arcstone-mcp-sidecario.github.trencinodin-stack/arcstone-mcp-sidecar
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours secobserve-mcp (83/100 against 65).

 secobserve-mcparcstone-mcp-sidecar
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C65/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week381–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

secobserve-mcp vs MCPProxysecobserve-mcp vs dns-doctorsecobserve-mcp vs spintax.net MCP serversecobserve-mcp vs npm Registry MCP Serversecobserve-mcp vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers